Eye Candy Of The Day

( No nudes. )

Granny.
_______________________

The Fool wrote:

( No nudes. )

Why?

Saying that is a good way to get a thread full of nude pics.

Alexi wrote:

Granny.
_______________________

The Fool wrote:

( No nudes. )

Why?

Saying that is a good way to get a thread full of nude pics.

I have nothing against it. It's the people who host this internet forum who does.

( They could literally shut the forum down if we did.)

If it wasn't for them I would post all the nude eye candy I want.

Yeehaw!

Ariel Rebel. (She looks much better with her clothes on, so she's good for this thread.)

Quote :

I have nothing against it. It's the people who host this internet forum who does.

( They could literally shut the forum down if we did.)

I'm very curious about this, I mean, how internet content is controlled, can you post a link of some sort to the rules/laws of the host?

"The IP address of dissidentsphilosophy.forumotion.com is 74.86.112.135

The IP address 74.86.112.135 is assigned to Great Britain (UK)" (https://www.forumotion.com/)

"Location of the IP address
74.86.112.135:
Dallas in United States."

"OrgName: SoftLayer Technologies Inc.
OrgID: SOFTL
Address: 1950 N Stemmons Freeway
City: Dallas
StateProv: TX
PostalCode: 75207
Country: US"

Ouch! Looks to go through the UK and the US. (Delete or edit this post if you feel it violates your privacy.)

Or for example, from the registration page, what is this about?

"and more generally any message contravening the French laws are prohibited."

I was gonna put in Megan Fox but I don't think she's as pretty as these girls now that I take a second glance. These are more baby faced and naturally beautiful (kristin kreuk is my favorite)




Her new movie 'street fighter' comes out in february I believe.

Just a natural beauty no hollywood star really comes close to.




She looks cute in any picture :/

To SilentSoliloquy

Kristin Kreuk? She's alright.

Although I have always said being a fan of the televised show smallville that Cloey should of always played the character role of Lana instead of Kristin Kreuk.

But then again I am heavily biased in favor for Allison Mack anyways. ( Does the whistle.)

To Alexi:

Arie Rebel: Nice

Quote :

I'm very curious about this, I mean, how internet content is controlled, can you post a link of some sort to the rules/laws of the host?

Quote :

Illicit contents
Forums that does welcome or promote warez, piracy, hacking, cracking, spamming, attacks against networks or servers, pornography, racial hatred, crimes against humanity, inappropriate activities on the servers, or any other actions which violate any applicable laws, aren't allowed. Any forum which contains texts, links, pictures, animations, videos or any other content recognized as illegal will be deleted without notice or warning. Forumotion.com reserves the right to delete any accounts or forums considered like not conform to the rules quoted here or specified in Forumotion.com or in the international website rules according to the international internet law. Any illegal content or act can or would be reported to the concerned services and prosecuted.

https://www.forumotion.com/en/create-forum/terms-of-service.htm

It's virtually the same for every internet forum generator out there on the net when it comes to terms of service.

Eye Candy Of The Day

( P.S. Why is it that everytime I search for women models all I get is Japanese women.)

( What's going on in Japan? It appears they have more models than we do.)

KK's features are in perfect symmetry and health. She's above most others because they lack these basic natural qualities in beauty.

Her hair and skin is perfect. She needs no make-up. Her eyes are large and spaced apart, highly arched. Her nose is small, and finely featured and holds the eyes and lips in a perfect alignment, and the lips are, of course, full and shaped nicely. And most of what makes the symmetry is the similarity in each feature to the other; same size, same distance etc.

All these other chicks are off on the scale. KK beats them by a long shot.

You need an artist's eye to catch these things, not just a hard dick

SilentSoliloquy wrote:

KK's features are in perfect symmetry and health. She's above most others because they lack these basic natural qualities in beauty.

Her hair and skin is perfect. She needs no make-up. Her eyes are large and spaced apart, highly arched. Her nose is small, and finely featured and holds the eyes and lips in a perfect alignment, and the lips are, of course, full and shaped nicely. And most of what makes the symmetry is the similarity in each feature to the other; same size, same distance etc.

All these other chicks are off on the scale. KK beats them by a long shot.

You need an artist's eye to catch these things, not just a hard dick

Quote :

You need an artists eye to catch these things, not just a hard dick

Where I come from darling male biology is art.

Males are loose and sloppy in selection and taste. They're more like crayons on a wall.

Fuck all these little girls and stick-figures.

Here is some real eye candy:

That last picture gave me the creeps. ( Shivers.)

I thought it would.

The Fool wrote:

That last picture gave me the creeps. ( Shivers.)

Indeed. This is better,


___________

The Fool wrote:

( P.S. Why is it that everytime I search for women models all I get is Japanese women.)

( What's going on in Japan? It appears they have more models than we do.)

I wonder why?


___________

Sorry, but this is not (to mine eyes) her finest image,



I don't know what is excepting that head shot back on page 1.

___________

But this Gemma Ward! Mirror left sides (her's),



And rights,



SilentSoliloquy, check out this "game": http://www.morphases.com/editor/ , I wonder if Gemma Ward could be improved on?

___________

Since SilentSoliloquy is posting ladies, this is the man I always thought was sort of the ideal of good looks, Mickey Rourke (not recent images of him!),

Umm mirroring a face is very insufficient in telling whether or not a person has symmetry. One eye will always be larger than the other in a photo, the lips might be pursed or slightly apart, the eyebrows won't be plucked with precision and so on. I also admit that Adriana Lima or Gemma Ward are not my ideal face models (fat, unsculpted noses)- it was KK I idolized. Gemma Ward simply has extremely large, wide eyes that give her an exotic appearance. She is very rare.

Did you notice that you fucked up the scale on which you mirrored the image? The top is slimmer than the bottom..

And that guy is oogly.

Kristin Kreuk is nice enough looking. Though Gemma Ward is nicer looking (in the image you posted on p.1).

The mirror thing was just for fun, it's hard to choose the middle of the face.

SilentSoliloquy wrote:

...that guy is oogly.

Have you seen 9 and 1/2 Weeks? A woman might not understand this, but a person's beauty is more than skin deep, it also has to do with personality, manner, things like this.
Who is this?

What does any of this have to do with philosophy? Why is there even an off topic section? If you want tits, go look up porn. If you want a different topic, then go look up another site.

babelbell wrote:

What does any of this have to do with philosophy? Why is there even an off topic section? If you want tits, go look up porn. If you want a different topic, then go look up another site.

It has nothing to do with philosophy. Every website needs a place for people to unwind and not take life too seriously.

This section of the website is that place.

The Fool wrote:

babelbell wrote:

What does any of this have to do with philosophy? Why is there even an off topic section? If you want tits, go look up porn. If you want a different topic, then go look up another site.

It has nothing to do with philosophy.

You can never escape philosophy. Aesthetics, at the very least,

First google images result for "eye-candy":

Erica Durance ( Louis Lane.) on the show Smallville. ( Whistles.)

Carrie Ann Moss is nice. I personally like the younger version though.