| The irony of a linguistics subforum | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Natrolleon Trollaparte Potential Contributor
Number of posts : 13 Age : 29 Registration date : 2013-05-12
| Subject: The irony of a linguistics subforum Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:01 pm | |
| Nobody on this forum, minus myself, has a decent command of any language. | |
|
| |
imp-pulse Animated Voice
Number of posts : 336 Registration date : 2013-03-10
| |
| |
Natrolleon Trollaparte Potential Contributor
Number of posts : 13 Age : 29 Registration date : 2013-05-12
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:45 pm | |
| - imp-pulse wrote:
but some can at least howl adequately.
\!! You're a moron. | |
|
| |
imp-pulse Animated Voice
Number of posts : 336 Registration date : 2013-03-10
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:44 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Natrolleon Trollaparte Potential Contributor
Number of posts : 13 Age : 29 Registration date : 2013-05-12
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:11 am | |
| Okay. Quit with your delusional shit or you're going on the blocked list. | |
|
| |
imp-pulse Animated Voice
Number of posts : 336 Registration date : 2013-03-10
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:39 am | |
| need your nose wiped?
good bye. | |
|
| |
Natrolleon Trollaparte Potential Contributor
Number of posts : 13 Age : 29 Registration date : 2013-05-12
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Mon Aug 12, 2013 6:59 pm | |
| Enjoy the blocked list, you window licking fuck. | |
|
| |
imp-pulse Animated Voice
Number of posts : 336 Registration date : 2013-03-10
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:22 am | |
| | |
|
| |
imp-pulse Animated Voice
Number of posts : 336 Registration date : 2013-03-10
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:29 am | |
| | |
|
| |
imp-pulse Animated Voice
Number of posts : 336 Registration date : 2013-03-10
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:00 am | |
| happy birthday, Trollaparte ....as a gift, kindly accept u.s. definition below: - Quote :
- Demagoguery is a discourse that promises stability, certainty, and escape from the responsibilities of rhetoric through framing public policy in terms of the degree to which and means by which (not whether) the outgroup should be punished for the current problems of the ingroup. Public debate largely concerns three stases: group identity (who is in the ingroup, what signifies outgroup membership, and how loyal rhetors are to the ingroup); need (usually framed in terms of how evil the outgroup is); what level of punishment to enact against the outgroup (restriction of rights to extermination).
Demagoguery is always polarizing, and always relies on binaries. It is not distinguished by emotionalism or populism, not only because lots of very good and helpful methods of deliberation are emotional and populist, but because it is often not emotional at all, and quite often elite discourse. Demagoguery can look “rational” in that it can provide a lot of data, numbers, assertions, and even analyses (as in Grant’s Passing of the Great Race, or Laughlin’s report for the 1924 Immigration Act).
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: The irony of a linguistics subforum | |
| |
|
| |
| The irony of a linguistics subforum | |
|